<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>$3.60 &#187; Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mp285.com/category/romney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mp285.com</link>
	<description>wide world. in a web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:46:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The signs I see: Mitt lacks and John Edwards&#8230; envies blacks?</title>
		<link>http://www.mp285.com/2007/08/the-signs-i-see/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mp285.com/2007/08/the-signs-i-see/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mp285.com/2007/the-signs-i-see/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#8217;t it interesting how, on the one hand the Obama and HClinton candidacies supposedly signal a new day for America, but at the same time all this ugliness can&#8217;t help but seep out around the edges? Admittedly, I don&#8217;t have much faith in Romney, but I did expect better from John Edwards, before the Esquire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/07/23/romney-says-‘lighten-up’-to-sign-critic/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2007/images/07/23/t1home.romneysign2.tmz.jpg" title="mitt romney with osama obama moma sign" alt="mitt romney with osama obama moma sign" align="left" height="247" hspace="12" vspace="6" width="270" /></a></p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it interesting how, on the one hand the Obama and HClinton candidacies supposedly signal a new day for America, but at the same time all this ugliness can&#8217;t help but seep out around the edges?</p>
<p>Admittedly, I don&#8217;t have much faith in Romney, but I did expect better from John Edwards, before <a href="http://www.racialicious.com/2007/07/25/has-anyone-else-seen-this-cover/" target="_blank"><strong>the Esquire thing</strong> </a>(see below).</p>
<p>First, of course you&#8217;ve seen this: Mitt Romney posing with a sign that reads &#8220;<strong>No to Obama, Osama, and Chelsea&#8217;s Moma</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m all for poetry.  I even harbor a genuine soft spot for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meter_%28poetry%29" target="_blank">prosody</a> in general. And I must say, the sign is quite genius in its use of thematic regression, using &#8220;osama&#8221; to shine some radical Islam/terrorism on Barack Obama, and &#8220;moma&#8221; to shine some black on Hillary Clinton. Lead-footed American genius!</p>
<p>But really, Mitt. Show some class, not your ass.</p>
<p><span id="more-156"></span></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/07/23/romney-says-‘lighten-up’-to-sign-critic/" target="_blank">Romney</a></strong>:</p>
<p><img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/start_quote_rb.gif" height="13" width="24" />I don’t look at all the signs when I’m having pictures taken.<img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/end_quote_rb.gif" height="13" width="24" /></p>
<p>But, then, an unexpected touch of poetry:</p>
<p><img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/start_quote_rb.gif" height="13" width="24" />There are a lot of jokes out there. I’m not responsible for all the signs I see.<img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/end_quote_rb.gif" height="13" width="24" /></p>
<p>Sigh. That&#8217;s one way of putting it.</p>
<p><a href="http://mattersofrace.blogspot.com/2007/07/has-anyone-else-seen-this-cover.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_dqU-yorvjLM/RqatwG4szTI/AAAAAAAAAJo/UtoeqIuzN_o/s400/7d38_1_b.jpg" title="John Edwards Esquire Cover" alt="John Edwards Esquire Cover" align="right" height="370" hspace="12" width="278" /></a>Meanwhile, also at CNN, a second headline,  <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/08/07/elizabeth-edwards-cant-make-john-black-or-a-woman/" target="_blank"><strong>&#8220;Elizabeth Edwards: Can’t make John ‘black’ or a ‘woman’&#8221;.</strong></a>  Apparently:</p>
<p><img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/start_quote_rb.gif" height="13" width="24" />Elizabeth Edwards, the wife of Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, is gaining attention for recent comments on why her husband may receive less attention from the media – and campaign cash — than the two leading Democratic candidates.</p>
<p><strong>“We can’t make John black, we can’t make him a woman,” said Edwards&#8230;</strong><img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/end_quote_rb.gif" height="13" width="24" /></p>
<p>Oh but if you could&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Wendi Muse</strong>, writing on the Edwards&#8217; cover at <a href="http://www.racialicious.com/2007/07/25/has-anyone-else-seen-this-cover/">Racialicious</a>:</p>
<p><img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/start_quote_rb.gif" height="13" width="24" />Sound dystopian, doesn’t it? I think some people have an unrealistic expectation that wealthy white male political, economic, and social dominance will come to an overnight halt now that the babymakers and the coloreds have been given rights, and, God forbid, a few also happen to be gaining considerable support as they campaign in hopes of becoming the next titleholders for presidency of the United States, but anyone with half a brain could look around and see that the equality apocalypse is a loooong way off. <img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/end_quote_rb.gif" height="13" width="24" /></p>
<p>Yes, it is all very subtle and more than a little bit sinister, hiding behind irony and a new self-conscious sense that, if you know what you should say about race or class, then of course it&#8217;s okay to say it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mp285.com/2007/08/the-signs-i-see/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

