<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>$3.60 &#187; BFF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mp285.com/category/bff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mp285.com</link>
	<description>wide world. in a web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:46:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pearl? Jolie? It&#8217;s all Mighty confusing (updated w/ video)</title>
		<link>http://www.mp285.com/2007/05/pearl-jolie-its-all-very-confusing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mp285.com/2007/05/pearl-jolie-its-all-very-confusing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 04:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Mighty Heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glamour Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josephine Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mariane Pearl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mp285.com/2007/pearl-jolie-its-all-very-confusing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started this post thinking it would be about some of the brouhaha (or is this more of a hullabaloo?) about Angelina Jolie portraying Mariane Pearl in A Mighty Heart. Beauty as Power has a nice post on the choice as a race issue. The post also includes some background and interview material from Defamer, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/10/jolie_450x373.jpg" alt="Angelina Jolie in A Mighty Heart; also Daniel Pearl and Mariane Pearl." align="left" height="225" hspace="12" width="272" />I started this post thinking it would be about some of the brouhaha (or is this more of a hullabaloo?) about Angelina Jolie portraying<strong> </strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariane_Pearl" target="_blank">Mariane Pearl</a> in <em><strong><a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount_vantage/amightyheart/trailer1/">A Mighty Heart</a></strong></em>.<strong>  <a href="http://beautyfull.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/crossing-the-line/">Beauty as Power</a></strong><a href="http://beautyfull.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/crossing-the-line/"> has a nice post on</a> the choice as a race issue.  The post also includes some background and interview material from Defamer, People, and msNBC, whose various responses to Jolie playing a women of African descent range from accusations of her doing &#8220;blackface,&#8221; (<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14157112/">msNBC</a>) to the suggestion that she has only donned &#8220;bronzer and a wig&#8221; (<a href="http://defamer.com/hollywood/angelina-jolie/angelina-jolie-a-little-less-caucasian-looking-than-the-day-she-first-showed-up-on-set-206638.php" target="_blank">Defamer</a>) and also <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/05/22/cannes-review-a-mighty-heart/">Cinematical</a>). <span id="more-97"></span></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll come back to this&#8211; accusations of whitewashing, blackfacing, and so on&#8211; in my next post. But before we jump into the racial representation issue, we should first look at Pearl and Jolie&#8217;s story of how they came to be friends through mutual admiration, each seeing the other on screen and realizing that they might be BFF. In an interview in this month&#8217;s <a href="http://www.glamour.com/news/articles/2007/05/joliepearl" target="_blank">Glamour</a> editor-in-chief Cindi Leive declares that &#8220;Less than five minutes into our conversation, it&#8217;s clear that the bond between these two women is warm, respectful and real.&#8221;</p>
<p>I totally buy it, because they are both just wide-open empathy-machines. I spent some time at Pearl&#8217;s <a href="http://www.glamour.com/news/globaldiary" target="_blank"><strong>Global Diary</strong> site at Glamour</a>. Every story contains some moment of primal connection with her subject-women. One could imagine that, if Jolie were a reporter writing about women in the wake of 9/11, she might be Mariane Pearl. And if Mariane Pearl were an actress trying to, I don&#8217;t know, change the world through adoption, she would be Jolie. Or Josephine Baker. I am unclear.</p>
<p>The point is, connection in gender, temperment, and class (frankly) all stand to trump race, which goes unmentioned in the online interview. I&#8217;ll get my hands on the hard copy tomorrow, and make this a better post. But for now suffice to say that, while I am willing to buy the idea that Pearl and Jolie are <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/simpatico" target="_blank">simpatico</a>,  I do find it strange that the article never approaches the most notable aspect of the decision. The decision to cast Jolie as a woman of color is second only to the fact that the film is being produced by Brad Pitt&#8217;s Plan B production company. This latter matter, however,  is referenced quite compulsively throughout, mainly in all parties pointing out that Pitt committed to the film before his involvement with Jolie.</p>
<p>So we&#8217;re to imagine that <em>that</em> awkwardness has been cleared away. So why not at least mention the brown thing?</p>
<p>Or, to read it another way, might we imagine that that is what the whole simpatico thing is really about, consciously or unconsciously?</p>
<p><strong>6/24/07: I&#8217;m adding this video b/c it touches this sense of the simpatico and this sort of heavy valuation of global empathy&#8230;</strong></p>
<div id="cubeDiv" style="position:relative;"><span style="position:relative; z-index:2;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" id="swfclipv433731" width="200" height="200"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.thenewsroom.com/mash/swf/cube.swf?a=v433731&#038;m=29792&#038;v=1" /><param name="base" value="."/><embed src="http://www.thenewsroom.com/mash/swf/cube.swf?a=v433731&#038;m=29792&#038;v=1"base="." width="200" height="200" name="swfclipv433731" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></embed></object></span><span id="voxAdv433731" style="position:absolute;z-index:2;"></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mp285.com/2007/05/pearl-jolie-its-all-very-confusing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

