<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>$3.60 &#187; Beyonce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mp285.com/category/beyonce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mp285.com</link>
	<description>wide world. in a web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:46:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jordin Sparks&#8217; Weight Statement + Dreamgirls!</title>
		<link>http://www.mp285.com/2007/06/jordin-sparks-weight-statement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mp285.com/2007/06/jordin-sparks-weight-statement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America Ferrera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dreamgirls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordin Sparks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keira Knightly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MeMe Roth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ugly Betty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curvaceousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full-figuring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight statements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mp285.com/2007/jordin-sparks-weight-statement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago I mentioned America Ferrera, of Ugly Betty fame, making her &#8220;weight statement.&#8221; In that post, I talk about weight statements as non-stories; they&#8217;re just there to give media an opportunity to make &#8220;news&#8221; out of female celebrities&#8217; weights, casting such stories as positive stories about the women&#8217;s self-esteem so that they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2007/news/070611/jordin_sparks180.jpg" alt="Jordin Sparks pink dress" align="left" height="273" hspace="12" width="205" />A few months ago I mentioned <strong>America Ferrera</strong>, of <em>Ugly Betty</em> fame, making her &#8220;<strong><a href="http://mp285.com/2007/ugly-bettys-weight-statement/" target="_blank">weight statement.</a></strong>&#8221; In that post, I talk about weight statements as non-stories; they&#8217;re just there to give media an opportunity to make &#8220;news&#8221; out of female celebrities&#8217; weights, casting such stories as positive stories about the women&#8217;s self-esteem so that they themselves are not accused of the bad-intentioned looking they initiated in the first place.</p>
<p>Of course what contradicts each story&#8217;s positive message is the fact that the story exists at all. <font color="#d529a5"><strong>Gee, might it not be the case that, when one is put in a position of defending <em>why</em> one is loveable, one might already be in trouble?</strong></font></p>
<p><span id="more-99"></span></p>
<p>Well, close on the heels of <a href="http://mp285.com/2007/too-unfit-to-be-an-idol-some-bad-press-for-the-naao/" target="_blank"><strong>MeMe Roth&#8217;s</strong> facist anti-fat fanaticism</a> (is it fanaticism or gross opportunism? I&#8217;m still working through that one&#8230;), here comes <a href="http://www.people.com/people/package/americanidol2007/article/0,,20007868_20040690,00.html" target="_blank"><strong>Jordin Sparks&#8217; weight statement</strong></a> in <em>People</em> magazine, the link to which I caught over at <strong>Jennifer Weiner&#8217;s</strong> blog, <a href="http://jenniferweiner.blogspot.com/2007/05/over-at-my-better-halfs-blog-they-are.html" target="_blank"><strong>Snarkspot</strong></a>. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, Jordin Sparks loves her curves.</p>
<p><img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41843000/jpg/_41843332_knightly_getty.jpg" alt="Keira Knightly as too thin" align="right" height="147" hspace="3" vspace="0" width="107" />This notion of having &#8220;curves&#8221; is totally fascinating. It&#8217;s often staged as meaning not super-thin, but still &#8220;okay&#8221; (and there&#8217;s that caveat again &#8220;but still&#8230;&#8221;). Curviness, supposedly, makes a space in which one is allowed to be not skinny, because one has been determined as not fat&#8230;in the sense that &#8220;fat&#8221; denotes being unhealthy and undesirable, as opposed to just meaning &#8220;not thin.&#8221; Curvy = Beyoncé, Anne Hathaway, Kate Winslet, and America Ferrera&#8211; women who are not even remotely overweight, but who nonetheless have to <strike>explain</strike> justify not being underweight, á la Kate Hudson or Keira Knightly.</p>
<p>Celebrities are granted meaning by their places in the star system, but because they come into being in that closed system, they can only really sustain meaning in relation to each other. As a way of describing bodies, and thus attributing a relational meaning to those bodies, &#8220;curvy&#8221; marks an interesting differential.</p>
<p><img src="http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/dreamworks_skg/dreamgirls/_group_photos/jennifer_hudson39.jpg" style="width:138px;height:138px;" align="left" hspace="12" />I am thinking, for instance, of Jennifer Hudson and Beyoncé in <strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FDreamgirls-Two-Disc-Showstopper-Jamie-Foxx%2Fdp%2FB000O174CM%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Ddvd%26qid%3D1180716084%26sr%3D8-1&amp;tag=1369-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">Dreamgirls</a></em></strong>, whose plot hinges on all these contrasts between &#8220;regular&#8221; women (Effie) and symbolic, &#8220;exceptional&#8221; women (Deena). The contrast hinges on weight, with Hudson gaining weight for her role and Knowles starving herself  for hers. As regular women, Effie and Hudson are &#8220;real women.&#8221; As stars, Deena and Knowles aren&#8217;t to be taken seriously.</p>
<p>The real and the cinematic converge on the song &#8220;Listen,&#8221; which Knowles wrote. &#8220;Listen&#8221; is Deena <span style="font-style:italic;">and</span> Knowles&#8217; demand that they be, well, listened to&#8211;rather than only looked at, and the convergence is a matter of Knowles&#8217; relationship to the <span style="font-style:italic;">Dreamgirls</span> movie and Deena&#8217;s plight in the film. Knowles wanted to play Effie, but was told she would be unconvincing as the plain one with an exceptional voice, and Deena sings of being loved as a performer but not recognized as a &#8220;real&#8221; singer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.style.com/vogue/feature/021307/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.style.com/images/vogue/feature/021307/img03.jpg" alt="Jennifer Hudson Vogue cover" style="width:178px;height:122px;" align="right" height="122" vspace="3" width="178" /></a>Huh! <a href="http://jerseygoddess.blogspot.com/search/label/Dreamgirls" target="_blank"><strong>Nordette Adams</strong></a>, by the way, has a nice series of posts on Hudson, Knowles, and all the stuff with them around <span style="font-style:italic;">Dreamgirls</span>, including some pretty interesting clips of Star Jones interviewing Beyoncé. And speaking of weight, <a href="http://www.popmatters.com/pm/news/article/11622/vogue-breaks-boundaries-with-curvy-heavier-jennifer-hudson-on-cover/" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight:bold;">PopMatters</span></a> has a nice post on Jennifer Hudson on the cover of <span style="font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">Vogue</span>, as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/features/2007_swimsuit/beyonce/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.jossip.com/gossip/Beyonce%20-%20sports%20illustrated%20cover.JPG" alt="Beyonce Sports Illustrated Cover" style="width:127px;height:179px;" align="left" height="179" hspace="12" width="127" /></a>And there are many ways in which this new attention to the curvy might prove to be a good thing. Even though there&#8217;s still a bunch of rhetoric to plow through around her being so acceptable (not the least of which is racial), I do think the congratulation Hudson has received is good and real, not the least of which is the now-famous <span style="font-style:italic;">Vogue</span> cover. I mean, all Beyonce got for losing a bunch of weight was a stupid <span style="font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">Sports Illustrated</span> cover.</p>
<p style="font-weight:bold;">Okay, nevermind. It&#8217;s clearly time to come down from the stars&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mp285.com/2007/06/jordin-sparks-weight-statement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

